Home › Employee performance management in India
Employee performance management for a small Indian company
Most small Indian companies measure performance once a year, from memory, mostly about the last six weeks. The quiet performer loses, everybody knows it, and the exercise slowly loses its meaning.
What actually needs measuring
Three things, and they answer different questions:
- Delivery — did the work get done, on time, without being sent back? This comes from the record, not from an opinion.
- Responsibility — were the things this person is accountable for actually moved? This is the KRA half, and it needs targets.
- Behaviour — how they work with everybody else. Judged, and honest about being judged.
Why a yearly appraisal fails
Not because managers are lazy. Because human memory is recency-weighted, and twelve months of work does not fit in it. By the time the form is filled in, the only evidence available is what happened recently and what was unusually good or bad. Everything steady and reliable in between is invisible — which is precisely the behaviour you most want to reward.
The fix is not more forms. It is recording the work as it happens, so the appraisal has something to read.
Keeping it fair enough to survive contact with the team
A performance system fails the first time somebody can point at it and say "that is not right". Four rules do most of the work:
- Measure the manager too. If a manager sits on an approval for two weeks, the delay is theirs, not the doer's. A system that only measures downwards gets read as a stick.
- Never count approved leave as lateness. One sanctioned fortnight off should not wreck somebody's year.
- Account for volume. Somebody who finished one easy job should not outrank somebody who carried ten and finished seven on time.
- Show the working. Every number should trace to a named task and a date. If it cannot, do not show the number.
A workable month
- Work is assigned with an owner, a date and a priority. Nothing lives in a WhatsApp thread that scrolls away.
- Completion is claimed by the doer and confirmed by whoever asked for it. "Done" is not self-certified.
- Rework is recorded when work is sent back — this is your quality signal and it costs nothing extra to collect.
- At month end the delivery half of the score already exists. The manager only has to rate the KRAs and the behaviours.
- Recognition happens on the day, not at the review. A thank-you six months late is not recognition, it is paperwork.
What to do first
Do not start by writing KRAs for everyone — you will spend three weeks on it and the sheets will be out of date by the time you finish. Start by getting the work itself written down for one department for one month. The KRAs will write themselves once you can see what people actually do.
Start with one department and one month of real work.
Start your free 14-day trial See the live demoThe full Growth plan for 14 days. No card, nothing to install.
Common questions
How often should we appraise people?
Score monthly, review formally once or twice a year. A yearly appraisal built from memory mostly reflects the last six weeks, which is why the quiet performer loses.
Should performance be tied to attendance?
Only as a small behavioural component. Attendance measures presence, not output, and a system that leans on it rewards the person who sits at their desk over the person who finishes the work.
How do we stop managers rating everyone the same?
Make the measured half of the score come from the work record rather than from an opinion, and show the working. A manager who has to rate against a stated target and a visible delivery history has much less room to flatten everybody to "good".